|
COMMUNIQUE
The
Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) being concerned
about the recent degradation in the Quality of Service
(QoS) on the networks of telecommunications service
providers in the country held a Public Forum on
Wednesday June 27, 2007 at the Transcorp Hilton, Abuja
to:
Participants at the Forum were made up of
representatives of network operators, consumer groups,
experts on QoS issues and members of the general public.
A number
of presentations addressing the above issues were made
and the several contributions were received from
participants during an open discussion session. The
Forum identified critical issues that would require
immediate attention in order to mitigate the current
unacceptable QoS delivered by the various networks.
These issues include:
i.
|
Unreliable public Power Supply
|
ii.
|
Security
|
iii.
|
Limited Transmission Infrastructure
|
iv.
|
Network congestion
|
v.
|
Lack of Information to consumers on
downtime.
|
Power
Participants at the Forum identified power as the major
challenge to Quality of Services. Operators claim that
it contributes at least 70% to the Quality of Service
problem in the industry. It was observed that generally
the issues of power supply are within the ambit of
government hence the recent efforts to reform the energy
sector were applauded. However, there is a need to
accelerate efforts in this regards. Pending when the
government resolves the matter, operators were
encouraged to improve upon the backup power supply
deployments and also consider alternative power supply
sources.
Security
Participants brought to the fore the security challenges
faced by operators such as theft of generating sets,
diesel, vandalisation of installations, youth
restiveness etc. Various suggestions were made and it
was recommended that operating companies should reach
out to the police, civil defence corps and other
security agencies to form a joint task force to
aggressively address the issue of security. The
Commission is to send a report is to government to
highlight this threat to effective Quality of Service
delivery.
Limited
Transmission Infrastructure
The
Forum noted the huge investment by operators in this
area but encouraged them to do more.
The
Forum also noted that while it is the responsibility of
operators to build their infrastructure, continued
government support through the Universal Service
Provision Fund (USPF) and projects like SABI (state
accelerated Broadband Initiative), WiN (Wire Nigeria
Project) etc will be fast-tracked to support operators’
efforts.
Network
Congestion
Participants expressed great concern about operators’
penchant for adding more subscribers than their network
can accommodate.
The
Forum considered it advisable that operators should:
| |
limit promotions on their networks to only those that
will not encourage more minutes of call, and
|
| |
dimension their network within available capacity.
|
Lack of
Information on Network Failures
It was
noted that operators are not forthcoming with up-to-date
information to subscribers about network failures and
the challenges faced in their operations. Participants
identified repeated call attempts as one of the factors
responsible for congestion on networks and this has
multiplier effect across networks.
Resolutions by the Forum
i.
|
The primary responsibility of ensuring good
Quality of Service delivery rests with the
service provider
|
ii.
|
Operators should be more pro-active in
informing consumers of network failures and
downtime.
|
iii.
|
The public forum on QoS should be
institutionalized and held more regularly.
|
iv.
|
Govt is requested to fast track
reform in the power sector and building of new power
plants.
|
v.
|
Establishment of QoS Working Group comprising of
operating companies, representatives of ALTON, ATCON, representatives of the Commission,
consumer advocacy groups and other interested
individuals.
|
vi.
|
The commission reiterated the
availability of Funds under the Universal Service fund
for infrastructural development (especially in rural
areas) and invited operators to take advantage of this
scheme.
|
|